You are currently browsing the monthly archive for May 2012.

Paparan skrin dari akaun twitter @EzraZaid

Berikut adalah siri tweet dari @EzraZaid (Pengarah ZI Publication – anak Zaid Ibrahim) sebentar tadi yang mengumumkan pembatalan kedua-dua program yang dirancangkan untuk pengaku lesbian, Irshad Manji.

  • 1/8 MEDIA ADVISORY: Public events cancelled, Irshad Manji calls for free expression in Malaysia.
  • 2/8 Borders Books and Monash University have cancelled the public events of Muslim reformist Irshad Manji.
  • 3/8 Borders cites security concerns while Monash claims it has been pressured by Selangor Islamic Religious Department.
  • 4/8 “I am committed to holding one public discussion in Kuala Lumpur before my team and I leave,” Manji says.
  • 5/8 “We know that many Malaysians want to hear about Muslim reform and moral courage.
  • 6/8 … because my Twitter feed has received nothing but support from Malaysians since I announced my arrival in KL yesterday.”
  • 7/8 Manji’s publisher, KL-based ZI Publications, is trying to find a public space in which Manji can discuss her book, Allah, Liberty & Love
  • 8/8 Her previous book, The Trouble with Islam Today, is officially banned in Malaysia. -ENDS-
 Namun, kita masih tetap berwaspada kerana mungkin mereka akan terus anjurkan program ini dengan secara tertutup – baca para 4/8 dan 7/8:
“I am committed to holding one public discussion in Kuala Lumpur before my team and I leave,” Manji says.
ZI Publications, is trying to find a public space in which Manji can discuss her book, Allah, Liberty & Love
Teruskan pemantauan saudara.
************
Posting berkaitan sebelum ini:

Pagi ini saya telah mengirim satu emel ke pihak Monash University (melalui pegawai – En. Mohamed Ismail – nama dihebah sebagai “contact person” untuk program ini dalam poster sebelah). Emelnya:

Menurut laman: http://www.timeoutkl.com/books/events/Irshad-Manji-on-Moral-Courage-Creating-Space-for-Islam-and-Democracy nama tuan adalah diberikan sebagai contact person untuk program ini.
Kami yang mewakili NGO-NGO Islam membantah sebarang penganjuran yang menghina Islam seperti ini. Orang seperti Irshad Manji tidak sepatutnya diberi ruang untuk berterusan menghina Islam apatah lagi di negara kita ini.
Mohon pihak saudara batalkan program dan maklumkan kepada orang ramai pembatalan program ini dengan kadar SEGERA.

Selang beberapa minit beliau menjawab dengan kenyataan berikut dengan memetik kenyataan ketua jabatan:

There is no seminar scheduled by the School of Arts and Social Sciences on Friday 18th May 2012.

Our seminar schedule can be viewed athttp://www.sass.monash.edu.my/research/SASS-Seminar-Series.html

Prof James Chin, Head, School of Arts & Social Sciences

Dan saya dengan segera membalas emel tersebut dengan:

Terima kasih atas jawapan segera dari emel saya. Saya telah beberapa kali cuba menelefon tuan – tetapi tiada jawapan.
Memandangkan maklumat sudah tersebar luas yang mengatakan adanya satu program yang akan dilangsungkan di Monash University – termasuk di”Tweet”kan oleh penulis buku sendiri (http://twitter.com/#!/IrshadManji) dan Ezra Zaid (penerbit buku), adalah wajar pihak Monash mengambil inisiatif dengan membuat kenyataan penafian secara terbuka.
Ini dari tweet EzraZaid – penerbit buku: http://twitter.com/#!/EzraZaid/status/202621725110833152/photo/1 – poster program di Monash.
yang membuat pengumunan majlis ini sejak 16 Mei lagi – termasuk memasukkan nama tuan sebagi contact personnya.
Penafian yang lebih bersungguh dan terbuka amat perlu bagi mengesahkan jawapan emel tuan.
Semoga sama-sama kita banteras gejala songsang ini dari bumi tanah air kita.

Saya tidak pasti apakah benar-benar tiada majlis seumpama itu di Monash University kampus Sunway atau ianya suatu helah. Ini memandangkan hebahan program ini telah tersebar luas dalam pelbagai media, blog, tweeter dan Facebook.

Atau apakah program ini sememangnya akan diadakan tetapi tidak dianjurkan oleh Monash hanya sekadar mengguna premisnya sahaja. Apa-apa pun kita tetap bantah.

Hebahan yang saya ambil pada imej di atas adalah antara yang awal menyiarkannya termasuk menyebut nama pegawai, no. telefon dan emel yang boleh dihubungi (tidak mungkin Monash tidak terlibat?). Kalau pihak Monash University bersungguh dalam menafi penganjurannya, mereka MESTI membuat penafian yang lebih bersungguh.

Seorang sahabat yang kanan dalam profesion guaman turut menegaskan bahawa pihak universiti MESTI membuat laporan polis kerana ada pihak yang cuba mencemar nama baik universiti.

Sama-sama kita bantah penganjuran program sebegini dan menyeru pihak penguatkuasa mengambil langkah segera mengawal program ini dan yang seumpamanya dari diadakan di tempat kita. Wajar juga orang yang menghina Islam seperti ini tidak kita benarkan berada di tanah air kita.

Setelah program asalnya yang dijadualkan diadakan di Universiti Islam Antarabangsa, Gombak, dibatalkan (baca) dan pelancaran bukunya yang dijadualkan diadakan di The Borders Garden Mall ditangguh, nampaknya para pendokong gerakan Liberal dan LGBT tetap ingin mengadakan program untuk Irshad Manji ini.

Poster terbaru penganjuran program Irshad Manji di Monash University-Sunway Campus, Jumaat ini.

Terkini, menurut twitternya  @IrshadManji, program yang asalnya dirancang untuk diadakan di UIA itu kini diubah ke Monash University, kampus Sunway pada 18 Mei 2012 hari Jumaat ini.Dengan mengambil pengalaman pahit beliau di Indonesia (baca: Irshad Manji is having second thoughts on Indonesia), kini para penganjur menggunakan strategi menganjurkan program tersebut diwaktu orang lelaki Islam menunaikan solat Jumaat. Dengan mengadakan majlis tersebut di waktu ini mungkin mereka beranggapan bahawa umat Islam tidak mampu bantah.

NGO-NGO mesti bangkit dan bertindak segera untuk membantah serta membuat laporan polis agar penganjuran majlis yang menghina Islam, Allah dan Rasul ini dibatalkan.

Bukan sahaja pengaku Lesbian ini menghina Islam dalam buku dan tulisan beliau, dia juga turut menghina Islam dalam tweetnya terbaru apabila ada yang bertanya apakah majlis ini tidak memberi ruang untuk orang lelaki kerana ianya diadakan waktu solat Jumaat:

Hi, selamat datang 🙂 Is this event catered to Muslim women only? Not gonna include Muslim men? Friday prayer is at about 1-2pm

Irshad Manji menjawab:

All r welcome, sis. Quran does not prescribe how/when 2 pray. This is man-made, not God-given, ritual. Salaam from KL.

Kami menyeru pihak yang berwajib menyekat dan membatalkan program yang menghina Islam ini. Pihak JAIS mungkin dapat melakukan sesuatu memandangkan ianya dilakukan di dalam kawasan yang JAIS mempunyai bidang kuasa mutlaknya.

Sama-sama kita bantah!

Semalam, beberapa SMS diterima bertanya pasal satu program yang dianjurkan oleh sebuah institut di bawah naungan Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia (UIAM), yang memberi ruang seorang pengaku lesbian (self-confessed lesbian) untuk berucap tentang Islam. Dan di beberapa dinding FB rakan-rakan pun tercatat maklumat program tersebut disusuli dengan pelbagai bantahan.

Program yang disebut sebagai “Moral Courage: Creating Space for Islam and Democracy” itu dianjurkan oleh International Institute for Muslim Unity (IIMU) dengan kerjasama ZI Publications. Penceramahnya didatangkan dari benua Amerika Utara, Irshad Manji, yang secara terangan telah mengaku bahawa beliau seorang pengamal seks songsang.

Namun, lewat malam tadi, dilaporkan bahawa program ini telah dibatalkan oleh Rektor UIAM sendiri. Alhamdulillah. Dan tahniah kepada Prof Zaleha di  atas tindakan berani sedemikian.

Program tersebut pada asalnya dijadualkan berlangsung pada hari Isnin, 14 Mei 2012, jam 1.30 – 3.30 petang di Mini Auditorium, Level 2, UIAM Gombak.

Yang menjadi persoalan ialah bagaimana sebuah universiti Islam yang perdana di Tanah Air kita pada mulanya memberi ruang untuk musuh Islam yang mempromosi seks songsang LGBT, menghina Rasulullah s.a.w. serta memperlecehkan Al-Qur’an dalam tulisan, buku dan ceramah-ceramahnya.

Dengan berbaik sangka bahawa pembuat keputusan di IIMU dan UIAM tidak maklum dari awal tidak boleh dengan mudah melepaskan tanggung-jawab untuk memeriksa terlebih dahulu penganjuran majlis sebegini terlepas pandang. Mungkin ada elemen-elemen yang bersubahat dengan musuh Islam di dalam UIAM itu. Mungkin ada elemen yang terpengaruh faham pasca modenisme dengan mendokong pemikiran “sapere aude”. Ini wajar dihalusi oleh pentadbiran UIAM.

Musuh-musuh Islam tidak akan henti dari membawa pelbagai program yang bertujuan meracuni pemikiran dan budaya umat kita di sini. Ini menepati saranan yang diunjurkan oleh Cheryl Benard (Rand Corporation) dalam buku “Civil Democratic Islam”.

Syabas diucapkan oleh sekalian pencinta Islam yang mengambil sikap waspada dan sentiasa bersiap-siaga memantau aktiviti-aktiviti musuh Islam.

Panganjur bersama program tersebut pula, ZI Publications Sdn Bhd, adalah sebuah syarikat penerbitan yang ditubuhkan oleh Zaid Ibrahim (ZI) – yang beralamat di B-2-19, Merchant Square, Jalan Tropicana Selatan Satu, Pju 3, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, 47410. Kini, syarikat tersebut dimiliki dan diurus oleh anaknya Ezra. Ramai yang sangat arif berhubung pendirian Zaid dalam hal-hal begini. Zaid juga penyokong tegar IFC dan kumpulan Artikel 11.

Terkini Disember 2012:

Ustaz Kazim – Cinta Allah Cinta Rasul – di Keramat KL

*********

Ustaz Kazim: Aku Terima Nikahnya – 12 Mei 201

klik untuk paparan besar

Bicara Kasih Bersama Ustaz Kazim Elias bertajuk: Aku Terima Nikahnya

12 Mei 2012 (Sabtu)

9.00 pagi

Surau Al-Mustaqim

Jalan AU5C/8, Lembah Keramat

Klik untuk panduan peta: 

Gambar contoh: Pinggan mangkuk China Fine Bone menjadi koleksi kegilaan sesetengah orang

Sumber: Utusan
PUTRAJAYA 7 Mei – Muzakarah Jawatankuasa Majlis Fatwa Kebangsaan memutuskan penggunaan pinggan mangkuk atau perhiasan daripada tulang babi atau Bone China adalah haram.

Pengerusinya, Prof. Emeritus Tan Sri Dr. Abdul Shukor Husin berkata, biarpun tulang tersebut sudah bertukar rupa selepas diproses hingga menjadi abu ia masih dikategorikan sebagai najis berat.

Katanya, ia berdasarkan hukum syarak yang mengharamkan apa jua peralatan diperbuat daripada babi.

“Pada umumnya muzakarah berpandangan peralatan pinggan mangkuk yang dibuat daripada tulang babi walaupun sudah dihancurkan tidak dibenarkan.

“Pihak kami dimaklumkan sebanyak tujuh juta babi disembelih untuk tujuan ini. Biarpun sudah menjadi debu dan dibentuk seperti cawan hukumnya masih haram pada syarak,” katanya ketika ditemui selepas Muzakarah Jawatankuasa Fatwa Kebangsaan Kali Ke-99 di sini, semalam.

THE Bersih rallies have quickly established themselves as something of a ritual in Malaysia’s political calendar. The script goes something like this: thousands of protesters declare that they are going to march through Kuala Lumpur to demand electoral reform; a twitchy government and protest leaders spend days haggling over a suitable venue; the protest goes ahead in defiance of police demands; violence ensues, hundreds are arrested; government issues some apologies; everyone goes home. The only significant variant is the political impact. Last year it was huge—this year it will probably be very little.

Bersih means “clean” in Malay, and the Bersih movement is made up of a coalition of NGOs and civil-rights organisations that want the electoral system cleaned up so as to allow all parties a fair chance of winning elections. At the moment many claim that the electoral system is heavily rigged in favour of the ruling coalition, Barisan Nasional (BN), which has been in power continually ever since the country’s independence from Britain began in 1957. The Bersih rallies have thus become inextricably linked to the cause of the opposition, led by Anwar Ibrahim.

The Bersih 3.0 rally on April 28th certainly attracted more people than last year’s version, perhaps as many as 80,000 (although the police put the figure at about half of that). As there will almost certainly be a general election in the coming months, perhaps the high level of interest wasn’t that surprising. But by comparison last year’s rally, despite a relatively smaller number of protesters, achieved a terrific political impact.

At the time the government of Najib Razak badly mishandled the whole situation. Thousands of riot police were captured by video cameras and smart-phones laying into the unarmed protesters in order to disperse them; water cannon were fired into a hospital and more than 1,600 people were arrested. The use of state violence was a huge embarrassment to the government, confirming in many peoples’ minds the impression that the prime minister was indeed a repressive ogre of Malay nationalism and not the reforming liberal that he had claimed.

Stung by widespread criticism in the international press, Mr Najib’s government was forced to apologise for much of its behaviour. Subsequently it repealed a slew of outdated and repressive laws to win back its reforming credentials. A parliamentary committee was also set up to look into proposals for electoral reform. In all, a clear victory to Bersih.

This year it was more of a score-draw. Certainly, towards the end of the rally there was another eruption of violence, and the police were once again seen deploying water cannon and tear gas against the demonstrators. They arrested more than 400 of them. Once again there were reports of police brutality, and once again the prime minister had some quick explaining to do. This time Mr Najib felt obliged to apologise personally to a local reporter who had been beaten up by the police (he was one of several). Once again, these ugly scenes do little to bolster Mr Najib’s claims to be a different kind of reform-minded leader.

However, this year there were problems on the Bersih side too. Some protesters attacked and overturned a police car and it seems that about 20 police officers were wounded. This, of course, played into the government’s hands, allowing Mr Najib to claim that “The police were victims. They became targets and were beaten.” The leader of Bersih, Ambiga Sreenevasan, conceded that some people will think that “the rally had gone wrong” because of the unruly behaviour of a few protesters. The violence may even tarnish the broader movement for democratic reform, a bit. And Mr Anwar had some explaining of his own to do. He was caught on video near one of the police barricades talking to one of his colleagues; critics allege that he was inciting supporters to push aside the barriers. Mr Anwar himself says this is nonsense.

Either way, it is clear that Bersih won’t be able to dominate the moral high ground—at least not on the score of one weekend’s theatrics—as they did last year. The campaign for electoral reform goes on, but Mr Najib emerges from this year’s fracas with his reformist credentials essentially intact, not much worse for the wear.

source: http://ahmadalikarim.wordpress.com

Below are comments sent to my big sister’s blog post entitled, ‘Bersih 3.0… A peaceful demonstration?

  1. ‘Tell us why a police car ran into the crowd …a boy has been warded because of this….how dare you twist the story…how much did they pay you?’
  2. ‘were you there AA … why are you lying about things you did not see….everything was peaceful until police started gassing people…peaceful marchers….you are typical BN …just put your side of pictures on the media…LIARS..I was there. The police were the thugs.’

Aren’t the comments rude?

My big sister is 14 years old, she doesn’t work for BN and she is not a BN member, so why should BN paid her?

Bersih is fighting for a clean and free election, something like freedom of speech.

So if my big sister thinks that some of the Bersih 3.0′s demonstrator were rude, they should respect her opinion.

It is alright not to agree but do it nicely like the comment I received from ‘formalaysia’:

‘Dear Ahmad, I know you that from your post you have been reading the newspapers, but just to let you know, they are all biased. If you want to know the real truth, please read online newspapers like The Malaysian Insider and Malaysiakini which give an unbiased view on what happened. Crowd only became angry after excessive tear-gas and water cannon, and protestors overturned the police car because they THOUGHT SOMEONE WAS PINNED UNDERNEATH. So, don’t be fooled by some of the adults. XD’

If they said that police was brutal, why should they too act violently?

As the proverb says, two wrongs don’t make a right.

Videos clearly showed that the violent attacks by the demonstrators caused the accident, so they should accepted the fact and not blamed others; truth has no answer.

And there is no fool like an old fool, the adults should behaved like how adults should and not doing bad things, follow their anger, shouting bad words and act violently.

Please click the links below for photos and videos of Bersih 3.0 rude and violent scenes:

  1. Bersih 3.0:In Videos-Police Brutality?/Video-Keganasan Polis?
  2. Videos-Bersih 3.0 Riot Instigated By Anwar and Azmin?( Video-Anwar dan Azmin Signal Rempuh Dataran Merdeka?)
  3. Photos And Videos of Bersih 3.0 Riot (Gambar dan Video Rusuhan Bersih 3.0)
  4. Bersih 3.0 – As Peaceful As Promised?

Another proverb says, if you are patient in one moment of anger, you will avoid 100 days of sorrow.

I don’t agree with the end justifies the means because crime doesn’t pay so it’s no use to do bad things for any reason.

As you sow, so shall you reap, everybody who broke the rules during Bersih 3.0 should accept that they should be punished.

Bersih organisers should look before they leap, they should think of what would happen before starting a huge street demonstration.

And they must be responsible for the safety of their demonstrators and the violent actions by their demonstrators.

Wisdom is better than strength, the pen is mightier than the sword.

And all that glitters is not gold, a total freedom is not that good, at least for me

The writer, Ahmad Ali, now 9, says: I love to write and I started to write stories when I was 3 years old. I am very happy to start my own blog (at 5 years old). I want to be a politician when I grow up. I like Microsoft PowerPoint, Lego blocks, reading, writing stories, traveling and I love my mama very, very, very much.

 

source: http://aimanamani.wordpress.com

After my little brother, Ahmad Ali posted his blog posts on Bersih 3.0, he had received a number of comments from Bersih supporters disagreeing with him. But of course, that is expected since not everyone sees eye to eye with each other on everything. We all have our own opinions, and we are free to voice it out as long as we say it politely and willing to respect the opinions of others too. The comments are nicely written, explaining in detail why they do not agree with him. They are being polite and assertive; as how it should be in a healthy discussion. I find it interesting to how he answered them and that among others helps him to think beyond his age.

On the other hand, my little sister received two shocking comments from a reader of her blog. What my sister did was simply stating her point of view on this whole affair but as the result, she was labelled as a ‘typical BN’ and was insulted further by the accusation that she was paid by the Barisan Nasional(BN). The question now is what happened to the ‘freedom of speech’ the Bersih 3.0 demonstrators were fighting for? They wanted the press freedom in the mainstream media (meaning the freedom of speech) but the very person who went to the street fighting for freedom of speech insulted my sister just because of her different opinion. If they believe that ‘freedom of speech’ is only about agreeing with what they think is right, then they are what they claimed how the BN government is.

I used to have very high respects for the oppositions leaders and supported the first Bersih but the current events changed my mind. Now I do not understand what Bersih and the oppositions are really fighting for. And what happened during and after Bersih 3.0, including the attitudes of the Bersih 3.0′s demonstrators makes me even wonder what their true intentions are. Clean and free election and press freedom? I was sad to read an article in one of the main alternative media entitled, ‘Kereta polis meluru laju, langgar peserta BERSIH’, which twisted the incident while everyone (who cares to find the truth) can clearly see that the man (as shown in the picture of the article) jumped up onto the car to attack the car and he was not hit by the car as reported. Since that article was from a media which was regarded as unbiased and ‘clean’ by Bersih and the oppositions; their supporters just swallowed the story and refuse to watch various videos on YouTube (maybe claiming those videos has been edited by BN) to see how the accident really happened. Even a demonstrator who was near the Dataran Merdeka during the incident would says that, “I was there” hence I know what really happened- even though the accident happened in front of Sogo. If this is an example of press freedom that they are fighting for, then they are just as bad as how they claimed BN to be. Please listen to Micheal Jackson’s ‘Man In The Mirror’, first look at our faults and changed before telling others to do so. As my little brother wrote in his post, Bersih 3.0 Violence – The End Justifies The Means? two wrongs don’t make a right.

On my previous post I had included a video of Mr. Benji Lim’s outburst in the middle of a press conference. It is clear that he was trying to voice out his opinion that the Bersih 3.0 demonstration had been ‘hijacked’ by the oppositions who turned it into a political event and endangered the lives of the demonstrators. What happened to him after the outburst? He had been forced out of the press conference by two men clearly against his will for his last words were, “I am a citizen too”. Again, what had happened to the ‘freedom of speech’ that they are fighting for? And I wonder what will they say if the same incident happens during the prime minister’s press conference?

Freedom of speech means that everybody is free to say what ever they want to say; hence we cannot dictate others to say what we want them to say. So it seems like the ‘press freedom’ that Bersih is fighting for is nothing about the freedom of speech but it is all about reporting what ever they wish, no matter if it is a white lie as long as it is them who lie. Thus, I think that a complete freedom (in all aspect of our life) would only result in anarchy and chaos. There need to be rules to guide us, so that we’ll always be on the right path. Of course, the person who commented on my sister’s blog may claim that it is her right to accuse and insult anyone. And soon smokers would be demanding to smoke in the ‘non-smoking’ areas. And someone may say that this article must be written by another ‘typical BN’ :)

The writer, Aiman Amani says: I am 17 and among my hobbies are sketching, writing, collecting stamps, coins, bank notes, stickers and seashells. And my blog is where I write about myself, things that goes on around me or things that I wish to share with everyone :)

source: http://aeshahadlina.wordpress.com

I received two comments for my post, ‘Bersih 3.0… A peaceful demonstration?’ saying:

were you there AA … why are you lying about things you did not see….everything was peaceful until police started gassing people…peaceful marchers….you are typical BN …just put your side of pictures on the media…LIARS..I was there. The police were the thugs.”

“Tell us why a police car ran into the crowd …a boy has been warded because of this….how dare you twist the story…how much did they pay you?”

Please read: ‘We would have stayed peaceful if they haven’t sprayed us-Bersih 3.0 supporters.’ I wrote the above post to answer the above comments with video showing what happened before and after the incident.

Those comments really caught my attention. I am not a Barisan Nasional (BN) member; infact I am not even a BN’s supporter (after what happened, nor am I a Pakatan Rakyat’s supporter, either). I did not write the article (or any other articles) on BN’s instruction. I am just writing my point of view about the demonstration as a peace loving citizen of Malaysia. So, why should BN pay me? It is sad that there are people who sacrificed their time, comfort and safety to join a street demonstration to fight for a clean and free election when they actually do not understand what is freedom of speech. Now it makes me wonder, what exactly are the demonstrators demonstrating for?

The police were the thugs???

I also want a clean and fair election, even though I am not eligible to vote at 14 years old. Bersih is free to fight for a good cause but my complain is, why must they held a street demonstrations and disobey the law? And after looking at how the crowd provoked the police on the night before the event, I asked myself if all the demonstrators really wanted Bersih 3.0 rally to be peaceful?Please read: ‘Bersih 3.0:In Videos-Police Brutality/Video Keganasan Polis?’  

I was accused as a ‘typical BN’. So, for some of the Bersih 3.0 violent street rally demonstrators, those who do not agree with them are the ‘typical BN’ or paid by BN. And anyone who is sensible enough not to support the violant acts done by the demonstrators are BN supporters? Even my little brother understands that, ‘matlamat tidak akan menghalalkan cara’, Please read his blog post: Bersih 3.0 Violence – The End Justifies The Means? Odd… I thought that they are demonstrating for a fair and clean election and not for ‘Anti-Barisan Nasional’. Or are BN’s member right when they claim that Bersih 3.0 is actually the oppossitions’ rally?

Now, what did those plants do to justify their conditions after the event? Are they supporting BN or did they help BN and SPR to cheat in the past elections? Or maybe they are PDRM’s agents who provoked the demonstrators that started the riot; I wonder….

A fair and clean election means no cheating during the elections. If they claim that BN cheated in the pasts elections, so why did the opposition party that was accused to cheat in their own party elections by their own members and ex-leaders was also leading the rally? If the PR leads the country, can we be sure that all the elections are clean and free? But for some Bersih demonstrators, no other political party cheats but BN; so those who were not satisfied were paid by BN…….

So what exactly is Bersih 3.0 demonstration was all about? A fight for a clean and fair election… or was it an ‘Anti-Barisan Nasional’ demonstration?

Please click here for more pictures of the Bersih 3.0 street rally…

The writer, Aeshah Adlina, 14, says: I was born on the 6th of November. I have 4 siblings. I am the second in my family. I live in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. I am currently home-schooling. My favourite colours are pink, lavender and celeste. My hobbies are writing stories, reading books, and collecting stamps. I like to eat chili con carne very much.

Ingatkan saya …

... dalam pelbagai pertemuan dengan saudara-saudara sekalian, terutama selepas mana-mana sesi taklimat, kadang-kadang ada yang meminta sesuatu dari saya. Kerap kali dalam kesibukan serta kelemahan saya sendiri, ada ketika janji-janji tersebut terlupa saya tunaikan ... tolong ingatkan saya. PM di FB saya atau emel kepada saya akarimomar.wordpress.com/about

***

akarimomar Youtube Channel

Click here to go to my Youtube Channel:
http://www.youtube.com/akarimomar

Buku-buku Armies of God dan Sang Nila Utama & Lion of Judah MESTI DIBACA

Tulisan Mr. Iain Buchanan yang mendedahkan agenda Evangelis Kristian ...
Untuk tempahan dan pesanan.

Buku2 Iain - poster1

.

Bicara Promoter LGBT

Maulid Pelajar Tahfiz

Tembakan Bedil di Bukit Pak Apil

Klik untuk tonton

Buku-buku Karangan Awang Goneng: Growing Up in Trengganu + A Map of Trengganu

DAPATKAN NASKAH ANDA SEKARANG !!!
Klik imej:

.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW !!!
SMS: 019-3199788 (Karim)
email: akarimomar@yahoo.com

Bacaan Hizib

Archives

Effective Islamic Parenting

May 2012
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Taqwim Solat – Prayer Time

Al Masjid – Memakmurkan masjid

Sinopsis Kitab Fiqh Akbar

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 359 other followers

Tauhid