Monthly Archive

You are currently browsing the monthly archive for February 2014.

Di Sebalik Formula 10 Perkara Idris Jala

25 February, 2014 in Kalimah Allah | by akarimomar | 48 comments

Semenjak diketengahkan menjelang PRN Sarawak 2011, formula 10 perkara Idris Jala ini sentiasa dipenuhi dengan kontroversi. Dan sememangnya ianya berkontroversi. Saya turut bersama rakan-rakan lain membantahnya – baca kenyataan media PEMBELA. Formula tersebut dikirakan sebagai mengalah kepada desakan dan asakan pelampau evangelis yang sengaja mengambil kesempatan untuk menekan kerajaan Pusat dalam menghadapi PRN Sarawak ketika itu.

Formula Idris Jala TIDAK BOLEH menyanggahi mana-mana peruntukan undang-undang yang sedia ada

Izinkan saya ulangi bahawa apa-apa polisi atau arahan kerajaan, ianya tidak boleh mengatasi perlembagaan atau mana-mana akta negara dan enakmen-enakmen negeri yang berkaitan. TIDAK BOLEH.

Formula Idris Jala ini akan terbatal serta merta jika ianya bercanggah dan melanggar mana-mana peruntukan undang-undang yang telah sedia ada. Hatta walaupun sesuatu arahan itu dikeluarkan oleh Perdana Menteri sendiri – ianya turut terbatal.

Maka, dalam hal ini, jika ada mana-mana bahagian dari penyelesaian yang dikarang oleh Idris Jala ini menyanggahi mana-mana peruntukan undang-undang, ianya tidak laku – tak boleh pakai.

Persoalan yang kerap kita dengar apabila sesuatu tindakan dilakukan oleh pihak berkuasa Agama ialah suara-suara songsang yang cetek fahaman dalam isu yang dibicara. Kerap kali kita mendengar kononnya kerajaan Pusat telah pun bersetuju melalui formula Idris Jala ini maka mengapa JAIS “merampas Bible”?

[baca bicara analogi mudah untuk faham isu “rampasan Bible” dan kebebalan Mujahid mempertahankan muslihat Kristian]

Puak-puak pelampau Kristian sendiri yang menolak formula Idris Jala

Apabila pelampau Kristian membangkitkan isu formula Idris Jala ini, lupakah mereka bahawa mereka sendiri dulu pun sudah menolaknya. Sebaik sahaja formula ini diketengahkan, para pelampau evangelis ini menolaknya sambil berterusan mendesak demi mengambil kesempatan menekan kerajaan Pusat yang bersikap memberi apabila menghadapi PRN Sarawak. Apakah mereka lupa kebongkakan mereka sendiri? Apakah ini yang disebut sebagai menjilat kembali ludahnya di lantai?

Dalam kiriman terbaru di blog beliau (24 Feb 2014), Idris Jala dilihat cuba menjelaskan apa yang dimaksudkan beliau sendiri ketika mencadangkan kaedah penyelesaian tersebut. Seolah-olah memperakui apa yang telah saya sebut tentang formula beliau itu tidak dapat mengatasi mana-mana peruntukan undang-undang yang sedia ada, ianya juga dilihat semacam senada dengan apa yang telah disebut oleh Maximus Ongkili sebelum ini (baca apa yang telah saya sebut di sini – Isu Kalimah Allah: Perspektif Berbeza Dari Dua Pejuang Untuk Orang Kristian).

Maximus telah berkata “Besides Allah, I can always address God as Bapa Syurga in Bahasa, my native dialect ‘Kinorohingan’ Bapa Syruga, or Latin/Hebrew Jehovah, Yahweh and Trinity God in English. Using such terms does not in any way affect the quality of my worship.” Kini Idris Jala pula menyahut dengan berkata:

Furthermore, Christians in Peninsular Malaysia who are Chinese, Indians and others do not normally use “Allah” in English and their own vernacular language.

Maknanya, tidak perlulah berkeras hendak menyalahgunakan nama suci Allah kerana sememangnya kamu tidak guna pun.

Idris Jala turut juga menyelar kebodohan sesetengah orang yang berhujah dengan cara bagaimana orang Kristian hendak menyanyi lagu rasmi negeri yang mempunyai kalimah Allah. [yang telah saya ulas di sini: Isu Kalimah Allah: Bodohnya Anwar Ibrahim!]

Walau apa pun, kita MESTI sentiasa berwaspada. Apakah sebenarnya di sebalik penjelasan terbaru Idris Jala? Adakah sesuatu yang belum kita ketahui hasratnya? Untuk kita, usahlah kita berpolemik sesama kita dengan muslihat yang sengaja ditimbulkan puak-puak yang telah Allah pesan kepada kita supaya berhati-hati … al Baqarah: 120.

tambahan …

Perlu diingat, formula Idris Jala tidak membicara isu kalimah Allah – ianya soal pengimportan Bible bahasa Melayu. Maka tidak betul jika ada orang-orang yang cetek fahaman isu berhujah mengguna formula tersebut dalam perkara penyalahgunaan nama suci Allah oleh pelampau Kristian.

***************

Bacaan berkaitan isu-isu Kristianisasi:

Memperingati Pengorbanan Anggota Keselamatan – Bukit Kepong 23hb Feb 1950

23 February, 2014 in Anti-War, warisan sejarah | by akarimomar | Leave a comment

Semoga Allah s.w.t mencucuri rahmatNya ke atas ruh para pejuang dan ahli keluarga mereka yang gugur ketika mempertahankan Balai Polis Bukit Kepong dari pengganas komunis yang menyerang hendap mereka 63 tahun lampau.

Jenayah pengganas ini tidak mungkin mudah dilupakan. Kekejaman mereka melampaui batas kemanusian dengan membakar beberapa orang ahli keluarga anggota keselamatan.

Generasi muda mesti belajar dan fahami keganasan askar-askar komunis ini supaya tidak terikut-ikut dengan fenomena neo-komunis dan neo-sosialis yang sedang menyelinap masuk dalam masyarakat kita dengan wajah dan penampilan baru.

Lagi Mubaligh Kristian Berkeliaran …

21 February, 2014 in Islam, religion | by akarimomar | 3 comments

Kali ini diaporkan mereka berkeliaran di Pinggiran USJ pula. Yang ditahan kali ini merupakan sepasang warga asing (kemungkinan berasal dari Amerika Syarikat) bersama seorang berbangsa Cina. Menurut para sukarelawan pemantauan, mereka ini cuba menyebar risalah Kristian mereka sambil berhelah untuk diberikan kepada orang-orang Cina dan India.

Mereka tidak dapat memberi jawapan apabila sukarelawan pemantauan kita menanyakan kepada mereka jika mereka ingin mengedarkan risalah ini kepada orang-orang Cina dan India kenapa perlu risalah tersebut diterbitkan dalam bahasa Melayu? Dan jika mereka ingin mengedarkan risalah tersebut dalam bahasa Melayu, apakah mereka sendiri boleh berbahasa Melayu?

Sungguh aneh dan licik helah penipuan penjenayah Kristian ini.

Kita seru pihak berkuasa agar dikenakan tahanan agar kedua-dua warga asing tersebut dihalang untuk masuk ke Malaysia (Not-To-Land -NTL) di masa akan datang. Kita tidak perlu orang sebegini.

Di bawah adalah beberapa keping gambar yang sempat dikongsikan kepada saya sebentar tadi. Ada videonya sekali – mungkin perlu diedit dahulu bagi mengelakkan identity sukarelawan kita didedahkan. Kita usahakan untuk kongsikannya jika dapat.

Syabas kepada para sukarelawan yang peka dan sentiasa memantau suasana kemasyarakatan kita. Semoga Allah membalas usaha saudara sekalian.

Inilah yang disebut sebagai “sadduz zara’i” – menyekat segala punca dan pintu untuk berlaku sebarang pemurtadan.

***************

Pergerakan mereka yang telah dikesan sebelum ini:

Mestikah Orang Kristian Guna Nama Suci ALLAH?

19 February, 2014 in Islam, Kalimah Allah | by akarimomar | 8 comments

Apakah mesti puak-puak Kristian mengguna nama suci Allah dalam agama mereka? Apakah sememangnya Allah adalah salah satu nama yag mereka iktiraf sebagai nama Tuhan mereka?

Kenapakah nama suci Allah tidak dsenaraikan sebagai nama untuk Tuhan mereka dalam buku-buku yang ditulis oelh para paderi mereka sendiri?

Setakat tinjauan ringkas dari buku-buku yang dipesan, yang baru saya terima hari ini, tidak satu pun dari buku-buku tersebut menyebut Allah sebagai salah satu nama Tuhan orang Kristian.

Insha Allah dalam masa yang terdekat saya akan cuba dedahkan hasil penelitian lanjut buku-buku tersebut.

Kita lihatlah pembohongan yang tidak habis-habis oleh pengganas evangelis ini.

… udahlah bagi orang-orang kita yang tak sedar-sedar nak sokong para pengganas ini …

Orang-orang Yahudi dan Nasrani tidak sekali-kali akan senang dengan kamu sehingga kamu mengikuti agama mereka. Katakanlah (kepada mereka): “Sesungguhnya petunjuk Allah (Agama Islam) itulah petunjuk yang benar”. Dan demi sesungguhnya jika engkau menurut kehendak hawa nafsu mereka sesudah datangnya (wahi yang memberi) pengetahuan kepadamu (tentang kebenaran), maka tiadalah engkau akan peroleh dari Allah (sesuatu pun) yang dapat mengawal dan memberi pertolongan kepadamu. (Al Baqarah: 120)

**************

Kiriman-kiriman sebelum ini berhubung isu nama suci Allah:

Isu Kalimah Allah: Anwar Ibrahim vs. Pope Benedict XVI

18 February, 2014 in Islam, Kalimah Allah | by akarimomar | 3 comments

Fakta:

1. Anwar Ibrahim memperjuangkan untuk orang-orang Kristian di Malaysia dibenarkan mengguna kalimah Allah.

2. Pope Benedict XVI tidak mahu mengguna kalimah Allah dan bertegas untuk hanya guna Rabb (i.e. God, Tuhan)

Di antara kedua-dua mereka di atas, agaknya, siapa yang lebih faham tentang ajaran Kristian? Siapa yang lebih autoritatif kalau bercakap tentang Kristian? Siapa pula di antara mereka merupakan seorang politikus yang mencari populariti untuk meraih undi?

Anwar tidak henti-henti membawa slogan ratib kempen PRK DUN Kajang untuk menuntut bagi pihak orang Kristian mengguna kalimah Allah bagi terjemahan God dalam ajaran agama sesat yang kita minta perlindungan dari Allah setiap kali kita membaca Al-Fatihah.

Kalau Pope sendiri yang menolak penggunaan nama khas Allah untuk orang Kristian, kenapa ada orang Melayu Islam kita yang bersungguh menuntut sesuatu yang Pope Kristian sendiri tolak?

Pope Benedict pula sebagai ketua tertinggi Kristian tersebut bertegas membetulkan laporan media antarabangsa yang memetik ucapannya di dataran St. Peters pada 10 Okt 2012. Sebuah media antarabangsa melaporkan bahawa Pope Benedict menyebut nama suci Allah dalam ucapannya tersebut seolah-olah telah menaikkan syiar Islam di pusat pentadbiran Vatikan.

Laporan tersebut telah membuat pihak Vatikan segera membantah serta membetulkan laporan tersebut bahawa Pope tidak menyebut Allah tetapi menyebut Al-Rabb. Kenapa perlunya Pope betulkan laporan yang mengatakan beliau menyebut Allah? Bukankah para ekstremis Kristian di Malaysia ini bersungguh tuntut untuk guna nama suci Allah?

Terjemahan nama am bukan kepada nama khas

Ini HANYA MEMBUKTIKAN bahawa Pope TIDAK BERSETUJU dengan penggunaan nama suci Allah untuk tujuan merujuk kepada Tuhan dalam ajaran Kristian.

Ianya juga mengesahkan bahawa God terjemahannya ialah Tuhan dalam bahasa Melayu dan Rabb dalam bahasa Arab. BUKANNYA Allah, nama khas.

Apa yang susah sangat nak faham perkara semudah ini? – baca

**************

Bacaan berkaitan isu-isu Kristianisasi:

Malaysia’s Tiger In Waiting

17 February, 2014 in Islam, politik, Universal Periodic Review-UPR | by akarimomar | 2 comments

From: http://asadullahali.wordpress.com/

On January 8, 2014, the Coalition of Malaysia NGOs (COMANGO), made up of 54 separate human rights organizations, was judged by the Malaysian Home Ministry as an “unlawful organization” that “champions rights that deviate from Islam” and subsequently banned from operating within the Muslim majority country[1]. Two months prior, the Malaysian Muslim activist group, Jati, had declared “war” on COMANGO for their flagrant disregard of Islamic values and Malaysian sovereignty. Quoted in the Malaysian newspaper The Star, Jati president, Datuk Dr Hasan Ali had declared that COMANGO were “wolves in sheep’s clothing” who demanded a “call for the repeal of the Syariah law, which will eventually see the demise of Islamic laws that are a core foundation in Islam” after the latter had submitted a report to the UN, accusing the ruling party (Barisan Nasional) of human rights violations and suggesting reforms that would drastically alter the nature of the state.[2]

COMANGO claims that the accusations and the subsequent banning were unwarranted, though their UN report unashamedly suggested otherwise. For instance, the report calls on Malaysia to fully accede to the Declaration of Human Rights, which though advocates many good measures for mankind, in other ways clearly violates Islamic Law and disregards the historical and cultural differences that make up contemporary Malaysian society. For instance, the Declaration very clearly states in article 16.1 that “[m]en and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family”. To adopt this article, Muslims would be coerced into violating the Sharia by being made to allow marriages between self-proclaimed Muslims of the same sex.[3] Another article (18) states that “[e]veryone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance”. In other words, apostasy, which is considered a criminal act under Islamic Law for Muslims, would have to be abolished, and heretical views acting in the name of Islam, would have to be legalized and allowed to publicly challenge orthodox views, thereby undermining the state. The Declaration also calls for full freedom of expression, even if such expression violates the sanctity of Islam (A.19). It further goes on to state that governments should be chosen strictly by the will of all the people within the nation (A.21.3), regardless of historical or cultural circumstances. This of course is detrimental to nations like Malaysia, which since independence, has declared Islam as the supreme religion of the land and granted Malays full government control. Calls to end the current nature of governance disregard very clear and justified concerns in light of an extreme anti-Islamic and materially privileged minority population seeking power.

It would seem then that in light of COMANGO’s arrogant suggestions, the Home Ministry was in fact justified in their banning of the “human rights” coalition that sought to encourage and ultimately impose foreign structures of legislation onto a nation whose circumstances and values are in obvious disagreement. Since the banning however, Malaysia has not been saved from foreign value occupation and has only just begun its uphill battle in retaining not only its identity, but its political and cultural sovereignty. The 54 NGO’s that once threatened to undermine the Islamic values and structure of the state have now been exiled from discourse and influence, but they were merely flies. Among the people of Malaysia have been tigers in waiting, rearing their heads ready to pounce, which have and still are affecting the political, cultural, and religious landscape of the nation. Because they are not as transparent in their efforts of destabilization, accusations towards their activities seem misplaced and unwarranted. However, reviewing their stated goals and history reveals uncomfortable truths about their operational impact in this Muslim majority country.

The National Endowment for Democracy

Granting “freedom” across the world…

On September 21, 2012, the Malaysian newspaper The New Straight Times reported that certain NGOs within the country were being used by the United States to undermine the Malaysian government’s sovereignty. While the report was heavily criticized for giving very little evidence in support of these claims,[4] it did provide one clue: all of the stated organizations were being funded, quite openly, by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a Washington run non-profit funder of “democracy activism” overseas. While many critics saw no need for alarm at this fact, it raised quite a few eyebrows and may have had a major influence on the results of the recent elections, which saw Barisan Nasional retaining power for yet another year since Malaysia independence, despite a strong and active opposition coalition.

However, the NED doesn’t do itself any favours in attempting to garner the trust of foreign nations. On the “History” section of the NED website, the organization begins by explaining its origins as so: “In the aftermath of World War II, faced with threats to our democratic allies and without any mechanism to channel political assistance, U.S. policy makers resorted to covert means, secretly sending advisers, equipment, and funds to support newspapers and parties under siege in Europe. When it was revealed in the late 1960′s that some American PVO’s were receiving covert funding from the CIA to wage the battle of ideas at international forums, the Johnson Administration concluded that such funding should cease, recommending establishment of ‘a public-private mechanism’ to fund overseas activities openly.”[5] In this dramatized version of events, the NED unapologetically traces its activities and motivations to the covert methods of post-World War II democracy advocacy funded by the CIA. Being quite open about the need to be transparent and “public”, the story goes on to explain the evolution of this method up until the early 1980’s when the NED and its funding would be officially written into U.S. law under House Resolution 2195. This begun shortly after President Reagan had declared the need for an initiative “to foster the infrastructure of democracy – the system of a free press, unions, political parties, universities – which allows a people to choose their own way, to develop their own culture, to reconcile their own differences through peaceful means.”

Considered a private, non-profit corporate entity, the NED was legislated in such a way as to receive a large portion of its funds from the USAID (United States Agency for International Development). Though it claims to be a bipartisan organization,[6] its agenda and its major source of funding suggests otherwise. The NED however, was only made to be an umbrella organization for other initiatives under its wing, particularly the International Republican Institute (IRI) and the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI), both organizations which play an integral role in manifesting the project of democracy activism overseas.[7]

The IRI & NDI

The IRI claims that it is one of the four organizations created for the sake of “carrying out the work of the NED”.[8] The organization states quite openly on its “About” page that they work “in countries important to U.S. interests” by “helping political parties broaden their appeal” and “catalyse the efforts of democratic activists in a country”.[9] They attempt to assure the reader that “they cannot implant democracy” and also go on to clarify that they are a “non-partisan” organization. Their efforts and methods are best known by the people of Latin America, especially of Venezuela, given the rich and detailed documentation detailing the IRI’s involvement in a historical coup d’etat attempt (military government take-over) in the country.

The failed 2002 coup that lasted nearly 47 hours in Venezuela began through a campaign initiated by privately owned media corporations that manipulated its viewers into believing that President Hugo Chávez was oppressive and therefore needed to be violently overthrown. The military eventually stepped in and arrested Chávez , but he was shortly released thereafter due to mass demonstrations under suspicions that the nation had been manipulated by outside forces. On the night of the coup, the IRI had released a press statement stating that “[t]he Institute has served as a bridge between the nation’s political parties and all civil society groups to help Venezuelans forge a new democratic future, based on accountability, rule of law and sound democratic institutions. We stand ready to continue our partnership with the courageous Venezuelan people.”[10] In other words, the IRI took credit for an illegal act of political violence against a democratically elected leader that they simply didn’t happen to like at the time.

Other well-documented evidence suggests that the IRI also played major roles in coups elsewhere in the Latin Americas, including Honduras[11] and Haiti[12].

It should be of no surprise that the long-running chairman for the organization is Senator John McCain,[13] a war veteran and a neo-conservative U.S. politician who supported the illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003 under the Bush administration. Under McCain, the IRI has also been responsible for training many of the groups which initiated the mass demonstrations and protests that have recently shook the Arab world, such as in Tunisia and Egypt.[14] And while many may believe that these revolutions were justified, McCain, after learning of the Islamic motivations behind some of these groups, didn’t see the impact of his organization as producing positive effects for the region. In one interview, McCain was on the record as saying that he believed the revolutions were a “virus” sweeping across the region and a direct “threat to Israel”.[15] The IRI, while admittedly for democracy across the world – even if violently instituted – doesn’t seem to like the type that goes against U.S. and Israel’s interests. So much for “bipartisan” and “peaceful”.

In case anyone is aware, the IRI is largest funded organization by the NED in Malaysia, with access to over 1.7 million RM per year.[16] On the NED website, the IRI’s stated purpose is to “promote the capacity of Malaysian civil society organizations to conduct awareness-raising public advocacy campaigns…[by implementing] a comprehensive training program and direct support for targeted campaigns on a variety of constituent priorities.”[17] Perhaps BN should be overlooking members of their own military, given that the IRI might be interested in training them for “democracy advocacy”?

The NDI, one of the other four organizations created under the NED, is usually alongside the IRI during these “peaceful” and “non-destabilizing” acts of democracy activism. The NDI also has a stated goal in Malaysia, “[t]o encourage greater fairness in the electoral process and accountability in governance in Malaysia…to work with parliamentarians, political party leaders, members from the ruling and opposition parties, and civil society groups…[and to] facilitate civil society groups’ access to information and capacity to utilize information”[18] The NDI in Malaysia receives nearly over 1 million RM per year from the NED.[19] In other words, as stated on their website, they influence society through the allocation of funds towards internet and televised media and also members of the opposition hostile to the ruling party.[20] No doubt, the organization is also headed by a “morally upright” member of the U.S. government, Madeline Albright, former Secretary of State under President Bill Clinton.[21] Albright was a major actor in the implementation of the 1990’s sanctions on Iraq, which were reported to have killed over 500,000 children[22] within the decade leading up to the Illegal invasion of the sovereign nation, under George Bush Jr. The purported aim of these sanctions was for the sake of U.S. interests, as stated in the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (Section 3): “It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime.”[23] In a 1996 interview with the televised independent news reporting show, 60 Minutes, Albright was asked by journalist Lesley Stahl regarding U.S. sanctions against Iraq, “We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?” Albright responded without hesitation, “I think this is a very hard choice, but the price—we think the price is worth it.”[24] Under the NDI, “democracy advocacy” is worth the price of half a million children dying of malnutrition, and yet Malaysians are worried about the fluctuating price of kangkung?

After the demise of COMANGO, the NED was forced to remove funding from one of the organizations included in the ban, SUARAM, a Malaysia based human rights organization. Reported in 2009, SUARAM was being funded 300,000 RM for its activities,[25] and possibly more prior to the recent 2014 prohibition. It would seem that the ban on one of the NED’s partners would be enough to expose the U.S. based organization and its affiliates of misdeeds, but the IRI, the NDI and other Malaysian born NGO’s operating under their wings are still operational. Which policy NGO’s, if any, are being trained by the IRI? Which media and social NGO’s are having NED funds allocated to them by the NDI? As it so happens, an intricate and well-entrenched network of native NGO’s have been gathered to operate under the whims of U.S. foreign interests. These organizations, whose agenda is to destabilize Malaysia in hopes of installing a democracy friendly to the U.S. (read “proxy government”), are secular extremists campaigning for an overthrow of the current system and Islam.

The Islamic Renaissance Front

The IRF is an Islamic think-tank based in Kuala Lumpur that considers itself “an intellectual movement… focused on youth empowerment and the promotion of Muslim intellectual discourse” which “echoes the voice of reason and compassion, and is committed to liberating the Muslim mind from rigid orthodoxy and conservatism.”[26] However, their understanding of ‘youth empowerment’ and ‘liberation’ has strong ties with the organizations it affiliates with. On the “Mission” page of the IRF website, it declares openly that it seeks to “maintain, nurture and expand our network of like-minded individuals, corporate entities, NGOs, governments and other bodies towards ensuring the effective dissemination of our analyses and positions”[27] effectively admitting that it only cooperates with organizations with similar causes and beliefs. Given this, it is incriminating that the IRF receives over 170,000 RM per year from the NED and works closely with the IRI and NDI in its efforts.[28] The think-tank’s chairman and director, Dr. Ahmad Farouk Musa,[29] believes himself to have the credentials to speak on matters related to ‘rigid orthodoxy and conservatism’ of the Muslim mind, with his Islamic degree in cardiothoracic surgery from the National Heart Institute[30] (note the sarcasm). Among his many scholarly achievements revolving around Islam, Dr. Musa has revealed IRF’s definition of ‘orthodoxy and conservatism’ on his blog, by suggesting they represent a group known as “Islamists, especially in Malaysia”.[31] Dr. Musa’s definition of an ‘Islamist’ is someone who articulates “an Islamic ideology in trying to respond to their current political and economic problems. They have always imagined that Islam provides a solution to all problems, a complete and ready-to-use divine system with a superior political and economic model. They argue that Muslims must return to the roots of their religion. Islamism entails a political ideology articulating the idea of the necessity of establishing an Islamic government, understood as a government that implements the sharia.” He then goes on to suggest that individuals with such aspirations implicitly create societies that are the “most corrupt states on earth”. What is Dr. Musa’s alternative? He suggests that “The fight to turn this country to become an “Islamic State” is a lost cause. There is no foreseeable future for such politics. Muslims should learn to live in a secular state and promote [their] fundamental Islamic values…”[32] In other words, as a self-declared Muslim, Dr. Musa calls for the abolishment of Sharia as the foundation of Malaysian society and asks Muslims to submit to a secular government “that is neutral to all the differing religious doctrines” while only promoting the most fundamental aspects of their religious values.[33] Hence, not only is Dr. Musa advocating for the abolishment of the Sharia, but also the abolishment of bumi putra rights in Malaysia. In another article, he even goes so far as to suggest that a “just non-Muslim is more worthy of being a leader than an unjust Muslim”,[34] therefore indirectly advocating for non-Muslim, minority rule over Malay society in the form of a pure democratic state that fulfils U.S. foreign interests. While it is undeniable that Malaysia suffers from some elements of corruption and poor leadership, to undermine the very foundational values and structure of governance that can just as easily remedy this problem, with a system totally based on kufr, is an act perpetuated by individuals typically labelled as munafiqun. In the very least, Dr. Musa’s statements and affiliations are seditious, especially in light of the fact that his organization claims to promote Islam. Coincidentally, Dr. Musa is also the Vice Chairman of BERSIH – a coalition movement of opposition parties who has staged numerous protests in Malaysia, even to the point of starting riots and attacking police officers in its most recent demonstration against the government – and is a writer for Malaysiakini, a self-proclaimed independent online newspaper in Malaysia.[35] If anything, it appears that the IRF, under Dr. Musa’s leadership, is campaigning to lead the Muslim community against the ruling party in hopes of overturning the system. It should be easy to see how the IRI plays a role in training members of the IRF in their mission to destabilize the country.

Other NED Affiliates

The IRI and the NDI require not only the services of the IRF in their reconstruction of Islamic thought and ideals, but also seek assistance from other NGO’s to help destabilize the country. For instance, the “legal wing” of the IRI, also known as “Lawyers for Liberty” (LFL) is another self-proclaimed non-profit and bipartisan organization operating in Malaysia that receives nearly 175,000 RM per year from the NED. LFL’s mission in Malaysia is to “To protect and promote human rights and access to justice. Lawyers for Liberty will continue to build a network of lawyers interested in the protection of human rights and conduct a range of activities such as legal rights and empowerment trainings, public information campaigns, and strategic litigation”,[36] or in other words, to undermine the laws of the nation through those who have knowledge of the civil and religious rulings in the country. Other organizations funded by the NED, such as Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd (350,000 RM) – the mother company to Malaysiakini – Merdeka Center for Opinion Research (250,000 RM), and Liberal Banter Sdn Bhd (175,000 RM), fall under the NDI’s allocated funds and methods of activism.

Malaysiakini has been notorious for its anti-government reporting and has even been called out in the past for the funding it receives from the NED. Premesh Chandra, chief editor of the online newspaper, has admitted to receiving these funds,[37] but states that they neither compromise the integrity and objectivity of his news staff nor make up a large portion of the companies returns. At the same time, however, Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd has refused to release public statements of the revenue it receives from its owners, subscribers and foreign funders.[38] This lack of transparency is telling. If in fact it were true that Malaysiakini is a non-profit and independent reporting agency, then it should not fear releasing its annual returns to the public. Further, why does such an organization need nearly 350,000 RM for its operations if this is such an “insignificant” amount of money that assists their project? Either the money being channelled to Mkini Dotcom is the primary source of funding for Malaysiakini or is clearly being used for something else. Why do they still receive the money – quite openly – from an organization that is obviously neither bipartisan nor peaceful in its agenda if they claim to be independent? The answer should be clear. Chandra and his editors receive most of their funding from the NED for operations and either uses the rest to fatten their pockets or to cover other unnecessary expenses. By receiving funding from the NED, which is allocated by the NDI to media outlets for the sake of “informing the public” (read, “confusing them”) to act out against the ruling party, the Malaysiakini project is revealed as a reporting site with a clear and obvious agenda – or just a bunch of greedy men taking advantage of the grievances of their audience. This is not shocking given their affiliations.

The Merdeka Center for Opinion Research and Liberal Banter Sdn Bhd are two other organizations that assist the NDI in information destabilization. The former is merely an anonymous poling centre that brings in opinions on separate issues against the ruling party and structure of Malaysian society and submits them to foreign or affiliate organizations in hopes of persuading them to give more funding or to assist in undermining the state.[39] The latter works primarily with youth in “educating” them in matters of policy and human rights issues (read, “anti-Islamic”) activities in hopes of drawing a large portion of the Malaysian population who is able and willing enough to stage protests, and violent activities if necessary. The NED lists their activities as providing “the Malaysian public, especially young Malaysians, with a forum to discuss critical social and political issues” and as organizing “a voter education project on issues that are often ignored both by the electorate and politicians during election campaigns”. One cannot help but read ‘BERSIH’ in between the lines.

What is Needed

Following the ban on COMANGO, the Malaysian government has proven that it can effectively protect its sovereignty against destabilizing agendas from overseas. While it is true that Malaysia suffers from many issues that need addressing, Islam is the necessary alternative to corruption and bad politics. Opponents to this position refuse to acknowledge this alternative because their agenda is not to assist Malaysian society, but rather to create a proxy government for the United States to hold more power and influence in the region, even at the costs of those that live there. Historically, all organizations operating under NED funding have led to either violent coups or rifts within societies considered “dangerous” or “unfit” to U.S. foreign policy. Given the historical evidence, we should not sit idly by and allow these NGO’s to infiltrate our societies, change our laws, or overturn our values for the sake of a few greedy and unsympathetic citizens who simply want power and more of it. Let us not stop at COMANGO, but go further and cut at the root of the problem. They were flies; but the tiger waits, patiently and willing.

[1] http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/ngos-outraged-at-ban-on-human-rights-coalition

http://www.omct.org/human-rights-defenders/urgent-interventions/malaysia/2014/01/d22525/

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2014/01/08/home-ministrys-ban-on-comango-is-ridiculous/

[2] http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2013/11/16/Muslim-group-Jati-declares-war-on-Comango.aspx

[3] http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/

[4] http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2012/09/21/nst-report-%E2%80%98ridiculous-and-rubbish%E2%80%99/

[5] http://www.ned.org/about/history

[6] http://www.ned.org/about

[7] http://www.ned.org/about/history

[8] http://www.iri.org/learn-more-about-iri/history

[9] http://www.iri.org/learn-more-about-iri-0

[10] http://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/478

[11] http://www.chavezcode.com/2009/07/role-of-international-republican.html

[12] http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/29/international/americas/29haiti.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

[13] http://www.iri.org/learn-more-about-iri/board-directors-and-officers

[14] http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/15/world/15aid.html?_r=0

[15] http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/02/03/142130/mccain-egypt-virus/

[16] http://www.ned.org/where-we-work/asia/malaysia

[17] http://www.ned.org/where-we-work/asia/malaysia

[18] Ibid

[19] Ibid

[20] http://www.ndi.org/about_ndi

[21] http://www.ndi.org/albright_mk

[22] http://www.nytimes.com/1995/12/01/world/iraq-sanctions-kill-children-un-reports.html

[23] http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-105publ338/pdf/PLAW-105publ338.pdf

[24] http://fair.org/extra-online-articles/we-think-the-price-is-worth-it/

[25] http://www.ned.org/publications/annual-reports/2009-annual-report/asia/description-of-2009-grants/malaysia

[26] http://irfront.net/about-irf/introduction/

[27] http://irfront.net/about-irf/vision-and-mission-statement/

[28] http://www.ned.org/where-we-work/asia/malaysia

[29] http://irfront.net/about-irf/people-at-irf/

[30] http://med.monash.edu.my/about-us/Dr.-Ahmad-Farouk-Musa.html

[31] http://www.muslimsdebate.com/faces/sn.php?nid=79338=

[32] Ibid

[33] http://www.muslimsdebate.com/faces/sn.php?nid=30932

[34] http://www.muslimsdebate.com/faces/sn.php?nid=30931

[35] http://irfront.net/about-irf/people-at-irf/

[36] http://www.ned.org/where-we-work/asia/malaysia

[37] http://www.thestar.com.my/story.aspx/?file=%2f2012%2f9%2f22%2fnation%2f12067491&sec=nation

[38] http://www.mole.my/content/malaysiakini-details-please

[39] http://www.merdeka.org/pages/01_aboutus.html

http://www.merdeka.org/pages/03_methodology.html

Isu Kalimah Allah: Perspektif Berbeza Dari Dua Pejuang Untuk Orang Kristian

17 February, 2014 in Islam, Kalimah Allah | Tags: Anwar Ibrahim, Kalimah Allah, Maximus Ongkili | by akarimomar | 71 comments

Kita ingin melihat dua perspektif yang berbeza tentang cara penyelesaian isu kalimah Allah dari dua orang pejuang untuk puak Kristian di Malaysia.

1. Maximus J Ongkili, Menteri Air, Tenaga dan Teknologi Hijau

Maximus Ongkili berkata bahawa penggunaan kalimah Allah itu bukan KRITIKAL malah tidak menggunanya tidak akan menjejas kualiti pengamalan agamanya

Akhbar Daily Express, 7 Feb 2014, melaporkan bahawa Maximus “became the first Christian Minister in the Federal Cabinet to openly distance himself from the church action of seeking a court solution on the use of the word “Allah” in Christian worship”. Maximus laporkan berkata:

“… if ‘Allah’ is critical in my prayers, then I can understand the sentiment. But if other words carry the same meaning (in addressing God), then I will not want to hurt others whose views are different from mine …” “Besides Allah, I can always address God as Bapa Syurga in Bahasa, my native dialect ‘Kinorohingan’ Bapa Syruga, or Latin/Hebrew Jehovah, Yahweh and Trinity God in English. Using such terms does not in any way affect the quality of my worship.”

Kata-kata sebegini datangnya dari seorang yang beragama Kristian yang memperakui bahawa nama suci Allah itu bukan suatu istilah yang “KRITIKAL” dalam upacara keagamaan Kristian. Inilah juga yang disebut dalam penghakiman yang dibuat oleh Hakim Zawawi Haji Salleh dalam rayuan kes kalimah Allah di Mahkamah Rayuan tahun lalu, bahawa penggunaan nama suci Allah itu bukan suatu yang integral yang dimestikan penggunaannya dalam ajaran Kristian. Pendirian Maximus Ongkili ini jauh berbezanya dengan seorang lagi pejuang untuk penganut agama Kristian di bawah ini.

2. Anwar Ibrahim, pemimpin Parti Keadilan Rakyat yang tidak pernah dipilih secara demokratik

Kesungguhan Anwar untuk menjadi jagoan di kalangan orang-orang Kristian dalam meraih undi mereka tidak dapat disangsi lagi. Saban hari sudah menjadi suatu zikir wajib untuk Anwar sebut di mana-mana ceramah. Terbaru, di dalam ucapannya di gereja Holy Family Kajang semalam (16 Feb 2014), beliau sekali lagi mempermainkan isu ini dengan mengatakan orang Kristian terpaksa berkata “Alhamdu Lord” kerana “adanya larangan” untuk orang Kristian menyebut Allah. Ini sudah menjadi berapa kali bodoh? (boleh baca ulasan saya sebelum ini: Isu Kalimah Allah: Bodohnya Anwar Ibrahim! – saya sudah banyak kali sebut semenjak isu ini bermula bahawa kita tidak paksakan orang Kristian panggil “Abdul God” kepada kawan mereka yang bernama Abdullah) Sebenarnya orang Kristian DILARANG MENYEBUT Alhamdulillah oleh paderi mereka sendiri. Lihat petikan dari majalah mereka sendiri “Christianity Today”, bahawa paderi Kristian ini yang melarang orang-orang Islam yang sudah murtad dan masuk agama Kristian dari berterusan menyebut nama Allah:

He asked me to not use the term Allah because Allah is evil, Allah is the Devil, Allah is the black stone, Allah is an idol.

Terjemahannya:

Dia (paderi itu) melarang saya guna kalimah Allah kerana Allah jahat, Allah adalah Syaitan, Allah adalah batu hitam (Kaabah), Allah itu adalah berhala.

Sungguh aneh. Ketua pemimpin Kristian yang tidak bersetuju dengan tuntutan penggunaan kalimah Allah, orang Islam pula yang bersungguh hendak paksakan tuntutan ini diteruskan. Apakah perlu keruhkan suasana ini? Apakah motif dan tujuan Anwar? Apakah kita masih tidak dapat bezakan? Apakah kita masih mahu membiarkan paderi-paderi sebegini berterusan menghina nama suci Allah? Apakah kita masih redha?

**************

Bacaan berkaitan isu-isu Kristianisasi:

mobTV Membicara Isu-isu Kristianisasi Dan Kalimah Allah

16 February, 2014 in Islam, Kalimah Allah, Maklumat | by akarimomar | 65 comments

Klik pada imej untuk tonton

Pelbagai interpretasi mengenai tindakan pegawai penguatkuasa JAIS yang melakukan operasi merampas Bible Bahasa Melayu yang mengandungi kalimah Allah di premis Persatuan Bible Malaysia (PBM) di Petaling Jaya pada 3 Januari 2014 lalu. Ada yang mengatakan JAIS perlu bijaksana dalam mengambil tindakan dalam konteks memelihara keharmonian masyarakat yang perlbagai agama. Persoalannya adakah umat Islam sahaja yang perlu menjaga hati sedangkan pihak dari agama lain boleh melontarkan isu-isu yang mampu menganggu gugat keharmonian itu.

Tonton temubual lain di mobTV – klik di sini

Temubual lain sebelum ini:

***************************************************

Bacaan berkaitan isu-isu Kristianisasi:

Isu Kalimah Allah: Bodohnya Anwar Ibrahim!

13 February, 2014 in Islam, Kalimah Allah | by akarimomar | 74 comments

Dalam satu temuramah dengan portal berita pro-Pakatan, The Malaysian Insider, berhubung rancangan PRK DUN Kajangnya yang disiarkan 4 Februari 2014, ketika merujuk kepada isu kalimah Allah, Anwar Ibrahim mengatakan bahawa

“I was in Penang speaking to religious scholars when I told them how do you explain a resident on Jalan Masjid who uses Jalan Masjid on his or her address?”

Kenyataan beliau di atas bahawa bagaimanakah seorang yang beragama Kristian yang tinggal di Jalan Masjid menyebut alamat kediamannya adalah merujuk kepada istilah Masjid yang termasuk di antara 35 istilah larangan dalam Seksyen 9 Enakmen Ugama Bukan Islam (Kawalan Perkembangan Di Kalangan Orang Islam) 1988 negeri Selangor (apakah “masjid” senarai larangan?).

Apakah begitu bodoh Anwar hingga tidak tidak mampu untuk faham maksud larangan tersebut?

Jikalau seorang penganut Kristian mempunyai kawan yang bernama Abdullah. Dia akan tetap panggil nama kawannya Abdullah. Enakmen yang melarang tersebut tidak mengatakan bahawa kini penganut Kristian dilarang memanggil kawan mereka yang bernama Abdullah dan dibenarkan hanya memanggil mereka dengan nama “ABDUL GOD” atau “ABDUL TUHAN”.

Inilah kebahlolan berhujah di luar konteks namanya. Kononnya ingin menunjukkan kepandaian berhujah untuk orang-orang Kristian maka memberi contoh yang tidak kena dan kiasan yang salah.

Teringat saya akan seorang lagi yang kononnya bijak berhujah dan selalu sahaja menganggap orang lain yang salah dan hanya dia dan kumpulannya sahaja yang mengikut sunnah. Hujah yang diguna mantan mufti ini pun sama dengan Anwar yang behujah di luar konteks dengan kiasan yang langsung tidak ada kena mengena dengan topik perbincangan. Asri MAZA mengatakan bagaimana orang Kristian hendak menyanyi lagu negeri Selangor jika dilarang menyebut Allah.

Kononnya hendak menunjuk pandai ini rupanya adalah hujah yang sama diguna oleh puak evangelis yang sentiasa menipu dan tidak redha dengan umat Islam seperti mana yang telah disebut dalam surah Al Baqarah ayat 120. Paderi Eu Hong Seng cuba berhelah kononnya:

How does one sing the state anthems of Selangor, Perak, Kedah, Pahang, Johor, Kelantan and Trengganu now, since there are references to “Allah” in these songs, as it is now implied to refer to the Muslim God only?

Apakah dia berpura tidak tahu bahawa sememangnya Allah yang dinyanyikan dalam lagu-lagu rasmi negeri-negeri Tanah Melayu adalah Allah Yang Maha Esa bukannya seorang manusia yang terpaku di tiang.

Sememangnya Islam adalah agama negeri-negeri Tanah Melayu yang berdaulat sebelum penganas penjajah Kristian yang mula membawa misi dari perjanjian Tordesillas untuk merompak kekayaan bumi yang dijajah, sambil berusaha memaksakan kesesatan fahaman mereka ke atas manusia sejagat demi membalas dendam perang salib – atau tema yang sering disebut sebagai “Gold, Glory and The Gospel” (sila baca buku atas tajuk tersebut karangan Louis Wright yang mencerita segala kekejaman tentera-tentera Kristian Eropah).

Maka tidak pernah kita mempunyai masalah dengan lagu rasmi negeri dan nama suci Allah Yang Maha Esa yang dinyanyikan. Tidak perlulah hati busuk paderi Eu Hong Seng cuba mencari helah untuk mempolemikkan.

Tidak ada salahnya untuk mereka menyebut nama suci Allah Yang Maha Esa asalkan jangan dia ertikan Allah itu untuk manusia yang dibunuh terpaku pada tiang itu. Itu yang ditegaskan dalam enakmen-enakmen negeri yang melarang penggunaan beberapa istilah tersebut untuk pengertian dalam agama mereka.

Cukuplah dengan kesesatan Kristian berhujah di luar konteks, tidak perlulah Anwar dan Asri menumpang sama dalam kesilapan sebegini. Ianya hanya menunjukkan betapa bodohnya kerana tidak faham isu yang dibicara.

***************************************************

Bacaan berkaitan isu-isu Kristianisasi:

Apakah Kini Berpesan Sesama Sendiri Ingatkan Firman Allah Sudah Tidak Boleh Lagi?

7 February, 2014 in Islam, politik | by akarimomar | 14 comments

Apa sudah jadi sekarang? Apakah kita tidak boleh lagi memetik ayat-ayat suci Al-Quran untuk memberi peringatan kepada sesama kita? Apakah kini ada pihak yang hendak haramkan ayat-ayat Al-Quran dibaca?

Apakah Kit Siang merasakan bahawa umat Islam sudah boleh beliau permainkan hingga boleh melarang khutbah Jumaat membaca serta memetik sesetengah ayat-ayat suci Al-Quran? Apakah boleh kita berdiam begitu sahaja dengan keceluparan seorang politikus keparat?

Turut dipersoalkan ialah sikap orang-orang kita yang melacur tunduk dengan keganasan Kit Siang ini. Apakah sesetengah pengampu Kit Siang di kalangan umat kita sendiri ini mahu turut sama mempersoalkan firman Allah Azzawajalla berhubung amaranNya tentang sikap JAHAT dan DENDAM orang Kristian itu? Astaghfirullah.

Kenapa Anwar merasa JIJIK apabila umat Islam diberi peringatan akan ancaman evangelis Kristian sepertimana firman Allah Taala dalam ayat 120 surah Al-Baqarah yang disebut dalam khutbah Jumaat – ayat yang Kit Siang pertikaikan?

Teringat akan saya suatu masa dahulu seorang pluralis tegar, Anwar Ibrahim (baca: Kemuncak Anutan Pluralisme Agama Bagi Anwar Ibrahim?), turut sama benci dengan orang yang cuba memberi peringatan tentang ancaman agenda pemurtadan yang dilakukan oleh evangelis Kristian sebagai “jijik”.

Saya siarkan bahagian khutbah yang dipertikaikan oleh manusia yang amat memusuhi Islam dan orang Melayu sejak dari dulu lagi itu …

“MANHAJ ISLAMI DALAM PERPADUAN UMMAH”

(31 JANUARI 2014 / 29 RABIULAWAL 1435H)

Sidang Jumaat Yang Dirahmati Allah,

Perpecahan sememangnya merugikan tetapi persoalannya mengapa umat Islam masih terjebak dalam perselisihan dan perpecahan walaupun dilarang agama. Jawapan persoalan ini bukan semata-mata terletak pada lemahnya penghayatan agama, tetapi didorong oleh hasutan musuh-musuh tradisi Islam seperti kaum Yahudi dan Nasrani yang tidak pernah padam, sebagaimana yang telah diperingatkan oleh Allah SWT melalui firman-Nya:

Maksudnya: “Orang-orang Yahudi dan Nasrani tidak sekali-kali akan bersetuju atau suka kepadamu (wahai Muhammad) sehingga engkau menurut ugama mereka (yang telah terpesong itu).”

Dalam kitab tafsir menjelaskan bahawa golongan Yahudi dan Nasrani akan terus berusaha sedaya upaya untuk memperdaya orang Islam supaya mengikut kehendak mereka. Justeru, mereka akan menggunakan pelbagai cara dan jalan untuk merosakkan akidah dan akhlak umat Islam. Tapi malangnya, peringatan Allah itu tidak dihiraukan oleh kebanyakan orang Islam. Maka tidak menghairankan bilamana terdapat di kalangan orang Islam itu yang terpedaya dengan musuh Islam. Akibatnya, Islam sesama Islam bercakaran dan berpecah-belah, sedangkan musuh-musuh kita ketawa meraih kejayaan memperdaya orang Islam yang alpa terhadap amaran dan peringatan Allah SWT.

Bayangkanlah, apakah kita sanggup bersubahat dengan musuh yang sudah jelas mahu meruntuhkan negara dan memecahkan tembok yang selama ini melindungi agama islam dan umatnya?. Percayalah, perbuatan yang melampau ini hanyalah merosakkan akidah umat Islam untuk menghakis kedaulatan umat Islam. Tariklah nafas kebijaksanaan, bukakanlah hati dan lihatlah apa yang sedang berlaku saat ini. Bukankah agama Islam sentiasa dicabar?. Bukankah maruah umat Islam sedang dipersenda?. Bukankah pemimpin umat islam sedang diaibkan oleh musuh-musuh Islam?. Maka, apakah perjuangan dan peranan yang telah kita laksanakan?. Apakah perasaan dan tindakan kita? Adakah kita hanya menjadi penonton atau telah kita zahirkan sokongan kita untuk mempertahankan kesucian islam dan hak umat islam?

Sidang Jumaat Yang Dirahmati Allah,

Keamanan dan keharmonian hidup yang kita kecapi hari ini antaranya adalah hasil daripada kewujudan dan pembudayaan semangat saling hormat menghormati, bertolak ansur, berkompromi dan muafakat di kalangan masyarakat yang berbilang kaum, agama dan adat resam. Semua rakyat berperanan dan memberi sumbangan terhadap perpaduan negara. Berkat perpaduan itulah juga yang membolehkan pemerintah melaksanakan pelbagai program pembangunan demi mensejahterakan hidup rakyat. Ini adalah isyarat jelas bahawa perpaduan adalah nikmat yang tidak ternilai harganya yang perlu terus dipelihara dan dikekalkan oleh masyarakat majmuk negara ini.

Sedarilah bahawa mengejar agenda bersifat perkauman, kepentingan kelompok tertentu dan peribadi dalam masyarakat berbilang kaum hanya akan menanamkan benih perbalahan yang akan memudaratkan dan menggugat keharmonian dan perpaduan. Ini kerana apabila berlaku perbalahan dan perpecahan, sukar untuk menyatukan kembali. Dan andai kata berlaku perbalahan, ia mungkin mencetuskan pula pergaduhan yang membawa kepada perpecahan dan permusuhan. Setelah itu, barulah manusia akan merasai betapa sengsara dan peritnya erti kesusahan bilamana nikmat keamanan serta keharmonian dicabul.

Sidang Jumaat Yang Dirahmati Allah,

Mimbar yang mulia ini ingin menyatakan bahawa umat Islam berkewajipan menghayati semangat pepatah melayu: Bersatu Teguh, Bercerai Roboh. Sebagai umat Islam kita juga wajib mengambil iktibar dari peristiwa penyatuan yang di cerminkan oleh bangsa- bangsa lain dalam mempertahankan maruah dan kepentingan mereka. Renungilah peristiwa dari peperangan Ahzab yang berlaku pada 7 Syawal tahun ke 5 Hijrah bersamaan 29 Februari tahun 627 Masehi, telah memberi pengajaran yang besar kepada kita dengan menyaksikan penyatuan golongan yang menentang Islam dalam memerangi Rasulullah SAW. Pengajaran besar dari peristiwa peperangan Ahzab menunjukkan kepada kita bahawa umat Islam pasti akan menghadapi serangan dan pakatan musuh untuk menghancurkan Islam dengan apa cara sekalipun. Jika dahulu Madinah diserang daripada segenap arah, maka kita pada hari ini juga diserang dari pelbagai arah, samada serangan secara fizikal atau spiritual seperti serangan dalam bentuk pemikiran, politik, ekonomi, sosial dan sebagainya.

Yakinlah diri sendiri bahawa kekuatan utama umat Islam pada hari ini ialah dengan mengekalkan perpaduan sesama kita. Kita diciptakan oleh Allah SWT dengan kriteria dan watak yang berbeza-beza. Kita berbeza dari segi adat, budaya, dan cara hidup serta ideologi. Namun kita dituntut untuk bersatu padu demi agama, bangsa dan negara. Inilah sebenarnya Manhaj Islami demi mencapai perpaduan ummah. Justeru marilah sama-sama kita merenung firman Allah SWT dalam surah al-Hujuraat ayat 10:

Maksudnya: “Sebenarnya orang yang beriman itu bersaudara maka damaikanlah di antara dua saudara kamu itu; dan bertakwalah kepada Allah agar kamu beroleh rahmat.”

Baca juga yang berkaitan … Orang Nasrani Dekat Sekali Kasih Mesranya Kepada Orang Islam (?)

dan Orang Melayu Bertelingkah – Mubaligh Kristian Masuk Kampung Melayu Mendakyah

	Radzi Hashim on Masjid Raja Bukit Besar Akan T…
	[V1DE0] Tuntutan BUA… on Apakah Tuntutan Hak Asasi Manu…
	[V1DE0] Tuntutan BUA… on Apa itu UPR (Universal Periodi…
	Mahathir HINA Imam B… on Apa Ertinya Zalim Yang Az…
	Hampir Seluruh Rakya… on Prebet Adam Mengamuk Di Chow K…

Monthly Archive

Di Sebalik Formula 10 Perkara Idris Jala

Memperingati Pengorbanan Anggota Keselamatan – Bukit Kepong 23hb Feb 1950

Lagi Mubaligh Kristian Berkeliaran …

Mestikah Orang Kristian Guna Nama Suci ALLAH?

Isu Kalimah Allah: Anwar Ibrahim vs. Pope Benedict XVI

Malaysia’s Tiger In Waiting

Isu Kalimah Allah: Perspektif Berbeza Dari Dua Pejuang Untuk Orang Kristian

mobTV Membicara Isu-isu Kristianisasi Dan Kalimah Allah

Isu Kalimah Allah: Bodohnya Anwar Ibrahim!

Apakah Kini Berpesan Sesama Sendiri Ingatkan Firman Allah Sudah Tidak Boleh Lagi?

Sila LIKE FB akarimomarpage

Ingatkan saya …

akarimomar Youtube Channel

Buku-buku Armies of God dan Sang Nila Utama & Lion of Judah MESTI DIBACA

Bicara Promoter LGBT

Maulid Pelajar Tahfiz

Tembakan Bedil di Bukit Pak Apil

Buku-buku Karangan Awang Goneng: Growing Up in Trengganu + A Map of Trengganu

Bacaan Hizib

Top Posts

Archives

Recent Comments

Effective Islamic Parenting

The Sulaimanian

Connecting Sulaimanians all over …

Recent Posts

Taqwim Solat – Prayer Time

Blog Kitab Bimbingan Mukminin

dari Kitab Bimbingan Mukminin

Blogroll

Warisan Trengganu

Al Masjid – Memakmurkan masjid

Traditional Islam

MUAFAKAT

Pertubuhan Muafakat Sejahtera Masyarakat Malaysia

Sinopsis Kitab Fiqh Akbar

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Tauhid

Tags

Monthly Archive

Ingatkan saya …

akarimomar Youtube Channel

Buku-buku Armies of God dan Sang Nila Utama & Lion of Judah MESTI DIBACA

Bicara Promoter LGBT

Maulid Pelajar Tahfiz

Tembakan Bedil di Bukit Pak Apil

Buku-buku Karangan Awang Goneng: Growing Up in Trengganu + A Map of Trengganu

Bacaan Hizib

Top Posts

Archives

Recent Comments

Effective Islamic Parenting

The Sulaimanian

Recent Posts

Taqwim Solat – Prayer Time

Blog Kitab Bimbingan Mukminin

Blogroll

Warisan Trengganu

Al Masjid – Memakmurkan masjid

Traditional Islam

MUAFAKAT

Sinopsis Kitab Fiqh Akbar

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Categories

Tauhid

Tags